Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL PRINTING INCORPORATED OF SARASOTA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COASTAL PRINTING INCORPORATED OF SARASOTA in 1730 INDEPENDENCE BLVD, SARASOTA, FL 34243 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 341760445.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Printing Incorporated of Sarasota — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Printing Incorporated of Sarasota is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1730 INDEPENDENCE BLVD
City
SARASOTA
State
FL
ZIP
34243
Mailing
1730 INDEPENDENCE BLVD, SARASOTA, FL 34243
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323110
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,730 · Current $4,365 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:     a. In the printing shop, employees were exposed to amputation and caught in hazards, in that, there was no control of hazardous energy program in place while conducting maintenance on machinery such as but not limited to, the Mitsubishi 6 color diamond 2008, NBO American B30 Perfection 444/3, NB26444/C and the Heidelberg SM52 SN# 205286, on or about 09/08/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4365
  • — Z (S) $8730

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $1,871 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:    a. In the maintenance room, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard, in that, the Ryobi bench grinder SN#04320 50403 was not properly anchored while used to sharpen tools, on or about 09/08/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1870.5
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch    a. In the maintenance room, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard, in that, the Ryobi bench grinder SN#04320 50403 work rest was 2 inches from the abrasive wheel while it was used to sharpen tools, on or about 09/08/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494
  • — Z (S) $4988

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 44 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.    a. On or about 09/08/2016 at the site, the employer did not have the OSHA 300 logs for 2013,2014, or 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $350
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  a. At the establishment, the employer did not have a written certification that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed, on or about 09/08/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341760445.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.