Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMATO'S BAKERY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AMATO'S BAKERY in 4 THOMAS DRIVE, WESTBROOK, ME 04092 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 341760965.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Amato'S Bakery — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Amato'S Bakery is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMATO'S BAKERY
Site address
4 THOMAS DRIVE
City
WESTBROOK
State
ME
ZIP
04092
Mailing
4 THOMAS DRIVE, WESTBROOK, ME 04092
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,017 · Current $5,612 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish  employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential crushing hazards:    Bakery - Seatbelts were not worn while operating a Toyota Forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5612
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Dec 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $11,224 · Current $7,857 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    Bakery - The employer had not developed nor implemented an energy control program, for use during tasks such as but not limited to the two person cleaning of the dough ball machine and the drum changing on the bread machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7857
  • — Z (S) $11224

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,017 · Current $5,612 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    At the Facility - The employer did not ensure that each operator of a powered industrial vehicle is competent to operate a vehicle as demonstrated by the satisfactory completion of the training and evaluations required by this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5612
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,811 · Current $3,368 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:    At the Facility - The area in front of the electrical panels was being used for storage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3368
  • — Z (S) $4811

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,017 · Current $5,612 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    At the Facility - The employer had not developed, implemented nor maintained a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5612
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  At the Facility - The employer did not have a safety data sheet for all chemicals used, such as but not limited to, ZEP Neutral Floor Cleaner and Purple Power Heavy Duty Multi-Purpose Pressure Wash Concentrate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  At the Facility - The employees were not provided information and training on the hazardous chemicals used in their work areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.30 A

Other-than-serious 5 instances 230 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $630 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.30(a): The employer did not keep a separate OSHA 300 Log for each establishment that is expected to be in operation for one year or longer:    At the Facility - The employer did not maintain separate OSHA 300 logs for each of each of its stores and bakery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $630
  • — Z (O) $900

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  At the Facility - The flexible cable on the power box of the dough molding table was not connected to a fitting so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or screws.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341760965.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.