Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MONTEMAYOR WELDING

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MONTEMAYOR WELDING in 4805 FM 809, DAWN, TX 79025 (NAICS 333992). OSHA activity number 341766400.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Montemayor Welding — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Montemayor Welding is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MONTEMAYOR WELDING
Site address
4805 FM 809
City
DAWN
State
TX
ZIP
79025
Mailing
1305 SMYTHE ST, PLAINVIEW, TX 79072
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333992
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.251 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(a)(1):   Employer did not ensure rigging equipment for material handling was inspected prior to use on each shift and as necessary during its use to ensure that it is safe. Defective rigging equipment was not removed from service.    On or about September 09, 2016, the employer did not ensure damaged rigging equipment used to lift loads was taken out of service. The employees performing work were exposed to struck-by and/or caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2662.1
  • — C (S) $3803
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.251 A06

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(a)(6):  Employer did not ensure that each day before being used, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were inspected for damage or defects by a competent person designated by the employer. Additional inspections was not performed during sling use, where service conditions warrant.  Damaged or defective slings were not immediately removed from service:    On or about September 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure chains and slings used to lift and suspend loads were inspected by a competent person prior to use and exposed employees to struck-by and/or caught-in-between hazards while raising sections of the incline conveyor.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2662.1
  • — C (S) $3803
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.251 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(b)(1):   Employer did not ensure that alloy steel chain sling(s) had a permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and sling manufacturer:  On or about September 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure that alloy steel chain slings used to raise tools and equipment were labeled to indicate size, grade, and lifting capacity and exposed employees to struck-by and/or caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3259
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.251 B03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(b)(3):   Employer used job or shop hooks and links, or makeshift fasteners, formed from bolts, rods, etc. or other such attachments were used:  On or about September 09, 2016, the employer did not ensure slings were attached in a secure manner to suspend loads and exposed employees working in and around the suspended load to struck-by and/or caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3803
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.251 B06 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(b)(6)(ii): The employer did not make and maintain a record(s) of the most recent month in which each alloy steel chain slings was thoroughly inspected, and did not make such record available for examination:  On or about September 09, 2016, the employer did not conduct periodic inspections of the alloy steel chain slings for their size, grade, and rated capacity and/or did not maintain those records or provide those records during inspection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3259
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.251 E08 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(8)(iii):   Employer did not ensure that synthetic slings that were damaged or defective were immedialtely removed from service when any of the following conditions was present:  snags, punctures, tears or cuts:    On or about September 09, 2016, the employer did not ensure employees walking working around the incline conveyor system assembly kept clear of the raised load and exposed them to struck-by and caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2662.1
  • — C (S) $3803
  • — Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341766400.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.