BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CARLOS ROBERTO DESOUZA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CARLOS ROBERTO DESOUZA in 67 TESINY AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341768919.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CARLOS ROBERTO DESOUZA
- Site address
- 67 TESINY AVENUE
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06606
- Mailing
- 176 BIRMINGHAM STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $1,870 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. WORKSITE: The employees using pneumatic nailing devices and gas powered air blowers during roofing activities were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1870.4
- — Z (S) $2672
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,619 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): WORKSITE: The employees performing roofing activities on a 6 in 12 pitch roof were not protected against the hazards of falling between 16 feet 9 inches and 20 feet 11 inches to the ground respectively by the use of appropriate fall protection systems/devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2618.7
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear: WORKSITE: The walking/working surface on the ground surrounding the Werner model D1332-2, type I, 32-foot aluminum extension ladder was not kept clear of roofing debris.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Carlos Roberto Desouza
View Carlos Roberto Desouza's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341768919.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.