JERSEY CITY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: PARDO MASONRY & CONCRETE, LLC.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of PARDO MASONRY & CONCRETE, LLC. in 235 PAVONIA AVE, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07302 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341772382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARDO MASONRY & CONCRETE, LLC.
- Site address
- 235 PAVONIA AVE
- City
- JERSEY CITY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07302
- Mailing
- 136 BRILL ST., NEWARK, NJ 07105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,563 · Current $1,782 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) 235 Pavonia Ave., Jersey City, NJ The employer failed to implement a written respiratory protection program for workers exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece during cutting of concrete block. Conditions observed on or about 9/8/2016.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1781.5
- — C (S) $3563
- — Z (S) $3563
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) 235 Pavonia Ave., Jersey City, NJ The employer failed to provide a medical evaluation for the worker exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece during cutting of concrete block. Conditions observed on or about 9/8/2016.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) 235 Pavonia Ave., Jersey City, NJ The employer failed to provide fit testing for the employee exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece during cutting of concrete block. Conditions observed on or about 9/8/2016.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01 I
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator: a) 235 Pavonia Ave., Jersey City, NJ The employer failed to train workers exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece about the proper fit, usage and maintenance of respirators. Conditions observed on or about 9/8/2016.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,563 · Current $1,782 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) 235 Pavonia Ave., Jersey City, NJ The employer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who use chemicals, including but not limited, Extech masonry cement which contains silica. Conditions observed on or about 9/8/2016.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1781.5
- — C (S) $3563
- — Z (S) $3563
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) 235 Pavonia Ave., Jersey City, NJ The employer did not provide effective training for employees who are exposed to chemicals, including but not limited to, silica found in Extech masonry cement. Conditions observed on or about 9/8/2016.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Pardo Masonry & Concrete, LLC.
View Pardo Masonry & Concrete, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341772382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.