Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VAIL INDUSTRIES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VAIL INDUSTRIES in 49 OHIO STREET SW, NAVARRE, OH 44662 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 341778892.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vail Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vail Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VAIL INDUSTRIES
Site address
49 OHIO STREET SW
City
NAVARRE
State
OH
ZIP
44662
Mailing
49 OHIO STREET SW, NAVARRE, OH 44662
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322211
Employees
53
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,482 · Current $4,489 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to develop, document, and utilize machine specific procedures for equipment within the facility including but not limited to, #15 Slitter, #19 Staley FFG, #20 McKinley RDC, and the #700 Martin FFG which employees were required to perform LO/TO for the control of hazardous energies. Hazardous energy sources include but are not limited to electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, and pneumatic.    NOTE: Employer must comply with 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C), when procedures are developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4489.2
  • — Z (S) $7482

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,482 · Current $4,489 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees were trained on the control of hazardous energies. Employees tasked with the LO/TO of equipment for maintaining and servicing had not received authorized training. Employees tasked with operating and working near equipment had not received affected training. Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, etc. Employees are tasked with maintaining, servicing, and operating equipment including but not limited to #15 Slitter, #19 Staley FFG, #20 McKinley RDC, and the #700 Martin FFG.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4489.2
  • — Z (S) $7482

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):    On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that the electrical,  pneumatic, hydraulic, and mechanical energy disconnects for the #15 Slitter, #19 Staley FFG, #20 McKinley RDC, and the #700 Martin FFG were operated in a manner that isolated the energy sources prior to authorized employees performing work, in that locks were not applied to each specific energy source nor were the energy source(s) relieved, disconnected, restrained, or otherwise rendered safer during servicing/ maintenance and set up operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,482 · Current $4,489 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that machine guarding was present on the #15 S & S Slitter. There were no barrier guards around the moving metal rollers of the slitter.    b) On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that machine guarding was present on the #19 Staley FFG . The back side of the stacker was not guarded to prevent employees from accessing the moving belts.    c) On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that machine guarding was adequate on the #20 McKinley RDC.  Areas of the line were not guarded effectively. Barrier guards were easily removable, there were no interlock devices and areas which contained machine hazards were not effectively guarded. The line includes sections such as but not limited to lay boy area (orange belts) and the stacker unit.    d) On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that machine guarding was present on the #700 Martin FFG . The accumulator center section was not guarded to prevent employees from accessing the moving/rolling parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4489.2
  • — Z (S) $7482

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Nov 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about September 15, 2016, the employer had not documented that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Nov 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about September 15, 2016 the employer failed to develop or implement a written hazard communication program at the facility. Employees work with or are exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to HyStar4 GCMI 90 Black (pH ~ 8.4-9.2), RM-10 (pH 3.5), ALAR FA 140F (pH 10), and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2016
Abate by
Nov 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about September 15, 2016, the employer failed to train employees on the safe use and handling of hazardous chemicals used in the workplace. Employees work with or are exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to HyStar4 GCMI 90 Black (pH ~ 8.4-9.2), RM-10 (pH 3.5), ALAR FA 140F (pH 10), and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Vail Industries's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341778892.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.