Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LLANO LOGISTICS INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LLANO LOGISTICS INC. in 5801 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD., LUBBOCK, TX 79404 (NAICS 445110). OSHA activity number 341779189.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Llano Logistics INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Llano Logistics INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5801 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD.
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79404
Mailing
5801 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD., LUBBOCK, TX 79404
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
445110
Employees
419
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $6,338 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use:    In the engine room, the employer did not ensure that a door that continued from the new engine room to the old engine room was marked "Not an Exit".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6337.8
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.119 F04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $8,873 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(4): The employer did not develop and implement safe work practices to provide for the control of hazards during operations such as lockout/tagout; confined space entry; opening process equipment or piping; and control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel:    The employer did not ensure that safe work practices, which include specific control over entrance into the machinery room procedures, were established and implemented for maintenance, contractor, or other support personnel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $8872.5
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.119 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $7,605 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(2): Refresher training was not provided at least every three years to each employee involved in operating a process to assure that the employee understands and adheres to the current operating procedures of the process:    The employer did not ensure that refresher training was provided to the ammonia refrigeration operator involved in the process safety management of the refrigeration system at least every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7604.8
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.119 G03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(3): The employer did not ascertain that each employee involved in operating a process had received and understood the training required by this paragraph. The employer had not prepared a record which contained the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training.    The employer did not ensure that any training received by operators of the ammonia refrigeration system was documented in a record which contained the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training. The employer did not have records documenting the training of each employee involved in operating and/or maintaining the ammonia refrigeration system, on the safety and health hazards, emergency shutdown operations and safe work practices, for the refrigeration operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $8,873 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:    The employer did not ensure an employee exposed to chemical hazards such as ammonia while draining oil from oil pots was fit tested, annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $8872.5
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.147 C04 I

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $8,873 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:      The employer did not have equipment-specific energy control procedures for the following equipment for activities covered by 1910.147. The lack of documentation of machine-specific energy control procedures expose employees to unexpected struck-by, caught-by and electrical hazards.         a) Ammonia compressors (C-1-C-4) in the engine room.         b) Screw compressor (C-5) in the engine room.         c) Condensers (EC-1&2) throughout the facility.              d) Re-circulators (V-1 & V-4) in the engine room.         e) High pressure receiver (V-1) in the engine room.         f) High temp accumulator (V-2) in the engine room.         g) Automatic purger (purger-01) in the engine room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8872.5
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.157 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): A portable fire extinguisher was blocked and not available for immediate use by employees.  The employer does not ensure employees exposed to burn injuries in he event of an emergency while working in the meat room where a portable fire extinguisher blocked by a safety pole was no available for immediate use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7243

1910.303 G01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,432 · Current $3,802 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electrical equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was in a passageway or general open space and was not suitably guarded when normally enclosed live parts were exposed for inspection or servicing:    The employer does not ensure that the working space around electrical equipment is used for storage. The employer allowed the storage of materials, such as but not limited to, boxes 5 gallon buckets and old parts adjacent to the electrical panels, inside the MCC room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3802.4
  • — Z (S) $5432

View Llano Logistics INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341779189.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.