Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J. MARTINS CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J. MARTINS CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 38 FLORENCE STREET, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341787893.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J. Martins Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J. Martins Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
38 FLORENCE STREET
City
PAWTUCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02860
Mailing
107 WALTHAM STREET, FLOOR 1, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Jobsite: On, or about, 09/22/2016 employees were performing construction activities on the roof of a two story residential structure and were not protected by a guardrail system, net system, or personal fall protection exposing the employees to a fall of approximately 22 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,272 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Jobsite: On, or about, 09/22/2016 employees were using an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof whereby the ladder side rails did not extend a minimum of three (3) feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1450
  • — Z (S) $2272

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  Jobsite: On, or about, 09/22/2016 the Louisville aluminum extension ladder used to access the roof had multiple structural defects and was not removed from service and immediately marked in a manner identifying it as defective or tagged with DO NOT USE and immediately removed from service until repaired.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341787893.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.