MCALLEN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE LUIS GARCIA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE LUIS GARCIA in 105 N. 9TH STREET, MCALLEN, TX 78501 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341796373.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE LUIS GARCIA
- Site address
- 105 N. 9TH STREET
- City
- MCALLEN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78501
- Mailing
- 105 N. 9TH STREET, MCALLEN, TX 78501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): At a commercial construction site, employees were installing foam panels to the exterior walls of a commercial building under construction on incomplete platforms of tubular frame scaffolds. The working platforms were not fully planked; exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: At a commercial construction site, employees used a tubular frame scaffold without base plates. Employees were exposed to fall hazards 10 feet above ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access. At a commercial construction site, a tubular frame scaffold located throughout a commercial building under construction and used by employees, did not have a ladder or other safe means to gain access to the scaffold platforms. Employees were exposed to falls 10 feet above ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).Note: Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. At a commercial construction site, employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using a tubular frame scaffold to install foam panels to the exterior walls of a commercial building under construction,1 1/2 feet from an overhead electrical power line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: At a commercial constructions site, employees used a tubular frame scaffold without fall protection, while installing foam panels to the exterior walls of a commercial building under construction. Employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections at Jose Luis Garcia
View Jose Luis Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341796373.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.