MERIDEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: GCS ENTERPRISES LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GCS ENTERPRISES LLC in 812B OLD COLONY ROAD, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341796829.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GCS ENTERPRISES LLC
- Site address
- 812B OLD COLONY ROAD
- City
- MERIDEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06450
- Mailing
- 186 GREENBRIAR ROAD, MERIDEN, CT 06450
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,604 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: Facility: A workplace hazard assessment was not conducted of the workplace to determine if hazards were present or likely to be present which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1604
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,285 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Facility: A written respiratory protection program was not implement for each employee required to half face tight fitting respirators while performing painting of cars, autobody work and working in and around hazardous chemicals such as (but not limited to) Chrome-A-Lite, Lacquer Thinner, Nason urethane, and Nason Ful-Base b/c.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1285
- — Z (S) $2138
1910.134 C03
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness: Facility: A respiratory program administrator qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program was not designated to conduct the required evaluations of the program's effectiveness for each employee wearing half face negative pressure respirators while performing sanding, painting, and other similar tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: Facility: Comprehensive respiratory protection training, including items such as but not limited to necessity, proper fit, usage, and maintenance, was not provided to each employee required to wear half face negative pressure tight fitting respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: Facility: An evaluation of all respiratory hazards in the workplace where employees are performing tasks such as (but not limited to) sanding, auto body repair, and spraying operations with products that contain hazards chemicals such as but not limited to Xylene and Methyl Ethyl Ketone was not conducted/completed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2672
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,285 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Facility: A medical evaluation for each employee wearing tight fitting negative pressure half face respirators was not provided prior to using the respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1285
- — Z (S) $2138
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. Facility: Each employee wearing tight fitting negative pressure half-face respirators were not fit tested prior to using the respirators and at least annually.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility: A written hazard communications program was not developed and implemented that met the criteria specified in 29 CFR1910.1200(f), (g) and (h) in that topics such as but not limited to pictograms, signal words, product identification, hazard statements, precautionary statements.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2672
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets. Facility: Each employee required to work with and handle chemicals such as (but not limited to) Nason Ful Bas B/C were not provided with information and training on the hazardous products and chemicals at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into the work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341796829.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.