NATICK, MA —
OSHA Inspection: JUAN JOSE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN JOSE in 92 SOUTH MAIN STREET, NATICK, MA 01760 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341802940.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JUAN JOSE
- Site address
- 92 SOUTH MAIN STREET
- City
- NATICK
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01760
- Mailing
- 42 MAIN STREET APT. 9, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $1,603 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) Location - 92 South Main Street, Natick, MA: On or about 9/28/16, employees were not protected from over head hazards while working below roofers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1603
- — Z (S) $2672
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Location - 92 South Main Street, Natick, MA: On or about 9/28/16, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet when working on a roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2245
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) Location - 92 South Main Street, Natick, MA: On or about 9/28/16, employees were exposed to falls when accessing a ladder that was not three foot above the landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2672
More inspections at Juan Jose
View Juan Jose's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341802940.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.