Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JORGE CASCANTES ROJAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JORGE CASCANTES ROJAS in NEAR 936 BELL AVENUE, WEXFORD, PA 15090 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341815512.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jorge Cascantes Rojas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jorge Cascantes Rojas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
NEAR 936 BELL AVENUE
City
WEXFORD
State
PA
ZIP
15090
Mailing
8788 INSPIRATION COURT, WALKERSVILLE, MD 21793
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,390 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:      a) Job site, near 936 Bell Avenue, Wexford, PA: On or about October 4, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that employees operating nail guns wore protective eyewear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1390
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.503 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,390 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Fall protection retraining was not done when inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicated that the employee had not retained the requisite understanding or skill:      a) Job site, near 936 Bell Avenue, Wexford, PA: On or about October 4, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that employees were properly retrained where exposed to falls of at least approximately 20 feet. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, failing to use fall protection systems/devices at all times, connecting restraint systems to the harness hip area D-rings rather than the rear area D rings, having rope grab systems set up/used in such a manner that an employee could fall over 6 feet and be exposed to swing hazards, and failing to utilize a shock absorbing lanyard system in these same instances.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1390
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.1053 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(2): Ladder rungs, cleats, and steps were not parallel, level, and uniformly spaced when the ladder was in position for use:   a) Job site, near 936 Bell Avenue, Wexford, PA: On or about October 4, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that ladders were level when in use in that the ladder used for access to/egress from the rear roof area was substantially leaning to one side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1053 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(3): The employer did not ensure that ladders were not be loaded beyond the maximum intended load for which they were built, nor beyond their manufacturer's rated capacity:   a) Job site, near 936 Bell Avenue, Wexford, PA: On or about October 4, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that ladders were used safely in that 2 employees were using the ladder at the same time over a lengthy span of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jorge Cascantes Rojas's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341815512.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.