Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COOL DENTAL PLLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of COOL DENTAL PLLC in 1055 FM 1960 W., HOUSTON, TX 77073 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 341817708.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cool Dental Pllc — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cool Dental Pllc is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
COOL DENTAL PLLC
Site address
1055 FM 1960 W.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77073
Mailing
1055 FM 1960 W., HOUSTON, TX 77073
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):      On or about October 5, 2016, in the x-ray room where employees were exposed to electrical hazards when using an outlet to power a computer without a faceplate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494
  • — Z (S) $3563

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:       On or about October 5, 2016, at the facility where employees were exposed to blood and/or other potentially infectious material when performing dental services without developing an exposure control plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494
  • — Z (S) $3563

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:    On or about October 5, 2016, at the facility where employees were exposed to blood and/or other potentially infectious material when performing dental services on patients without conducting training on blood borne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D04 III A 2 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not easily accessible to personnel or located as close as was feasible to the immediate area where sharps were used or could be reasonably anticipated to be found:      On or about October 5, 2016, located in the exam rooms where employees were exposed to sharps contaminated with blood and/or other potentially infectious material without having sharps containers in the exam rooms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494
  • — Z (S) $3563

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:         On or about October 5, 2016, at the facility where the hepatitis B vaccine was not made available to employees exposed to blood and/or other potentially infectious material when performing dental services on patients.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494
  • — Z (S) $3563

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $1,995 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:       On or about October 5, 2016, at the facility where employees were exposed to chemical hazards when working with chemicals such as, but not limited to, CaviCide, Vac Attak evacuation cleaner and Defend ultrasonic tablets for dental services without developing a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1995
  • — Z (S) $2850

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about October 5, 2016, at the facility where employees were exposed to chemical hazards when working with chemicals such as, but not limited to, CaviCide, Vac Attak evacuation cleaner and Defend ultrasonic tablets for dental services without providing training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $1,995 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:      On or about October 5, 2016, at the facility where employees were exposed to chemical hazards while using chemicals  such as, but not limited to, CaviCide, Vac Attak evacuation cleaner and Defend ultrasonic tablets without maintaining safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1995
  • — Z (S) $2850

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341817708.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.