Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QG PRINTING II CORP.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of QG PRINTING II CORP. in 4051 FONDORF DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 341818391.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch QG Printing II Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for QG Printing II Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4051 FONDORF DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43228
Mailing
4051 FONDORF DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323110
Employees
198
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 149 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $12,675

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1):  When information indicates that any employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer shall develop and implement a monitoring program.    a.  On or before October 3, 2016, on the production floor, the employer had not implemented a noise monitoring program for employees whose continuous noise exposure exceeded the action level of 50%, an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $12675
  • — C (S) $9959
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.95 G05 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii):  "Mobile test van exception."  Where mobile test vans are used to meet the audiometric testing obligation, the employer shall obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level.  Where baseline audiograms are obtained more than 6 months after the employee's first exposure at or above the action level, employees shall wear hearing protectors for any period exceeding six months after first exposure until the baseline audiogram is obtained.   a. As of December 12, 2016, the employer who had chosen to use the mobile test van exception did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employees first exposure as a press assistant II where continuous noise exposure exceeded the action level of 50%, an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $9959
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.95 G08 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(i):  If a comparison of the annual audiogram to the baseline audiogram indicates a standard threshold shift as defined in paragraph (g)(10) of this section has occurred, the employee shall be informed of this fact in writing, within 21 days of the determination.   a. As of November 3, 2016, the employer had not informed an employee who had a recordable standard threshold shift (STS) in the left ear of this fact in writing, within 21 days of the determination of the STS on or about August 15, 2016.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):  The employer shall train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section.  The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program.   a. On or before October 3, 2016, on the production floor, the employer did not ensure that all employees including temporary employees received annual noise training for employees whose continuous noise exposure exceeded the action level of 50%, an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $9959
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.101 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b):  "Compressed gases."  The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks shall be in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in Sec. 1910.6.   a.  On or about October 7, 2016, in the Southwest corner of the maintenance shop, the employer did not ensure that an argon compressed gas cylinder (full) was legibly marked, for the purpose of identifying the gas content by means of labeling or stenciling in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $9959
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.253 B01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(1)(ii):  Compressed gas cylinders shall be legibly marked, for the purpose of identifying the gas content, with either the chemical or the trade name of the gas.  Such marking shall be by means of stenciling, stamping, or labeling, and shall not be readily removable.  Whenever practical, the marking shall be located on the shoulder of the cylinder.   a.  On or about October 7, 2016, in the Southwest corner of the maintenance shop, the employer did not ensure that two acetylene compressed gas cylinders (full) were legibly marked, for the purpose of identifying the gas content by means of labeling, stenciling, or stamping.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 72 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6):  Workplace labeling.  Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with either:  29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i):  The information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers; or,  29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):  Product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.   a.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that the Baldwin mixer/acid etch tank containing CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4) on press N010/N011 was labeled, tagged or marked with the content and hazards.      b.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that the Baldwin mixer/acid etch tank containing CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4) on press C7009 was labeled, tagged or marked with the content and hazards.     c.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that the Baldwin mixer/acid etch tank containing CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4) on press C7007 was labeled, tagged or marked with the content and hazards.     d.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that the Baldwin mixer/acid etch tank containing CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4) on press C7008 was labeled, tagged or marked with the content and hazards.     e.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that the QuadTech mixer/acid etch tank (S/N: C403576.2.1.1) containing CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4) on press C5008 was labeled, tagged or marked with the content and hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 198 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $12,675
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a.  On or before October 3, 2016, the employer did not verify that the personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification for workplace hazards.    b. The employer did not verify that it had conducted a personal protective hazard assessment to ensure that employees were not exposed to fall and caught-in hazards on the unguarded open sided floors over the printing press equipment on the catwalk of the N010/N011 press line.    c. The employer did not verify that it had conducted a personal protective hazard assessment to ensure that employees were not exposed to fall and caught-in hazards where there was a 17-inch gap between the stairs to the third level of the catwalk and the angle deck of the N010/N011 press line.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $12675
  • — C (S) $9959
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 72 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2016
Abate by
Dec 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $9,799 · Current $12,675
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):  The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:     a.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that employees who serviced and/or maintained the Baldwin and QuadTech acid etch (CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514) systems and totes for the presses used appropriate eye and face protection in addition to the required safety glasses when exposed to the CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4), including but not limited to the following:  goggles, face shield, and/or combination of each, dependent upon the job task.     b.  On or about June 12, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that the employee who received a splash of corrosive CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 in the eyes and face while working on the Baldwin acid etch system for press C7009 was protected with more than safety glasses.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $12675
  • — C (S) $9799
  • — Z (S) $9799

1910.138 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 72 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2016
Abate by
Dec 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a):  General requirements.  Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    a.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that employees who serviced and/or maintained the Baldwin and QuadTech acid etch (CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514) systems and totes for the presses used appropriate hand protection when exposed to the CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4), including but not limited to the following:  durable and impermeable gloves with a cuff to protect the exposed skin of the wrist and lower arm.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 2 instances 72 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2016
Abate by
Dec 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $9,799 · Current $12,675
29 CFR 1910.151(c):  Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      a.  On or before October 3, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, the employer did not ensure that employees who serviced and/or maintained the Baldwin and QuadTech acid etch (CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514) systems and totes for the presses had suitable eyewash facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes within the work area for immediate emergency use when exposed to the CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 (pH 3.4).       b.  On or about June 12, 2016, at the South end of the production floor, there was no eyewash facility within the work area for immediate emergency use for an employee who received a splash of corrosive CR/T Fountain Solution QFS-514 in the eyes and face while working on the Baldwin acid etch system for press C7009.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $12675
  • — C (S) $9799
  • — Z (S) $9799

View QG Printing II Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341818391.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.