Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GO WORKS CONSTRUCTION CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GO WORKS CONSTRUCTION CORP in AT/NEAR 1612 GRAHAM COURT, PITTSBURGH, PA 15237 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341829067.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch GO Works Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for GO Works Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
AT/NEAR 1612 GRAHAM COURT
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15237
Mailing
188 JEFFERSON STREET SUITE 319, NEWARK, NJ 07105
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure:   Instances including, but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection systems/devices while up on top of building walls to mark joist locations where fall hazards of up to approximately 20 feet existed.   b) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection systems/devices were used near the tops of stairway openings where fall hazards of up to approximately 9 feet existed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2016
Abate by
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and did not train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Instances including, but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees were appropriately trained in fall protection prior to working on top of building walls to mark joist locations where fall hazards of up to approximately 20 feet existed.   b) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees were appropriately trained in fall protection prior to working near the tops of stairway openings where fall hazards of up to approximately 9 feet existed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways with 4 or more risers or rising more than 30 inches, whichever was less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:   a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that the stairway system leading from the first floor to the second floor had a handrail.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways with 4 or more risers or rising more than 30 inches, whichever was less, were not equipped with at least one stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge:   a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that the stairway system leading from the first floor to the second floor had a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The employer did not ensure that the top or top step of a stepladder was not used as a step:   a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used stepladders safely in that an employee stood on the very top step of the step ladder to do work for marking joist areas.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.405 G02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2016
Abate by
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv):  Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that appropriate strain relief existed on the power cord for the air compressor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View GO Works Construction Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341829067.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.