SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: HF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION in 540 HUYLER STREET, SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341830495.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 540 HUYLER STREET
- City
- SOUTH HACKENSACK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07606
- Mailing
- 14 WARBURTON AVE. APT. 3, YONKERS, NY 10701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
19 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jan 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: The employer, HF General Construction, did not submit to the agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required, on or about February 28, 2018. More specifically HF General Construction, did not submit to the agency documents demonstrating that employees who are required to wear respiratory protection, have completed respirator training. The employer must complete a written respiratory protection program and a written hazard communication program for affected employees, required by 1910.134(c)(1), 1910.134(k)(3), and 1910.1200(e)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,604 · Current $962 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a) a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees engaged in tuckpointing operations and mixing Poly Bond, which contains crystalline silica, are required to wear N95 dust masks. The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program, thus exposing employees to chemical hazards, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $962
- — C (S) $1604
- — Z (S) $1604
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a) a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees engaged in tuckpointing operations and mixing Poly Bond, which contains crystalline silica, are required to wear N95 dust masks. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for affected employees, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a) a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees engaged in tuckpointing operations and mixing Poly Bond, which contains crystalline silica, are required to wear N95 dust masks. The employer did not provide respirator training to affected employees prior to them wearing respiratory protection, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.34 A
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,283 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.34(a): Building or structure exits were not so arranged and maintained as to provide free and unobstructed egress from all parts of the building or structure at all times when it was occupied: a) Exterior Southwest Side of Building: The exterior egress route for a designated emergency exit was obstructed by a tubular frame scaffold, on or about, 10/12/16. b) Exterior Southeast Side of Building Adjacent to Dock Area: The exterior egress route for a designated emergency exit was obstructed by a tubular frame scaffold, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1283
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,726 · Current $1,636 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) Exterior Front of Building: An employee was exposed to head injuries while performing stucco work below a tubular frame scaffold and was not protected with any type of head protection, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1636
- — C (S) $2726
- — Z (S) $2726
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Exterior Front of Building: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a handheld Makita angle grinder, and was not protected with any type of face/eye protection, on or about, on 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1090
- — C (S) $1817
- — Z (S) $1817
1926.300 B01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use: a) Exterior Front of Building: Employees were using a 120volt Makita portable handheld angle grinder that was missing a safety guard, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2244
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(I)-(ii): a) Exterior Front of Building: An employee was performing stucco work from a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet above the lower surface, and the scaffold was not fully planked, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2244
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a) Front Exterior of Building: Base plates were missing from a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet in height from the lower surface, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2244
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a) Front Exterior of Building: Employees engaged in stucco work, climbed the poles of a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet in height from the lower surface, to access the work platform, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2245
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms: a) Exterior Front of Building: An employee was performing stucco work from a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet above the lower surface, without a standard guardrail system, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2245
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) Exterior Front of Building: An employee was performing stucco work from a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet above the lower surface, without a standard guardrail system, or personal fall arrest system, on or about, 10/12/16. b) Exterior Front of Building: An employee was installing brackets to secure cables to the perimeter front of the building and from the leading edge of the building's rooftop, without a standard guardrail system, or personal fall arrest system, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $1,603 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: a) Exterior Front of Building: Employees were performing stucco work from a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet above the lower surface, that was missing cross braces from the interior side of the scaffold, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1603
- — C (S) $2672
- — Z (S) $2672
1926.501 B04 I
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $1,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes: a) Exterior Front of Building: An unguarded floor hole opening on a fabricated tubular frame scaffold, two frames in height, at approximately 13 feet above the lower surface, exposed employees to a fall hazard while they were engaged in stucco work, on or about, 10/17/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1925
- — C (S) $3207
- — Z (S) $3207
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a) a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees engaged in mixing products, including but not limited to, Poly-Bond and StoPowerwall Stucco, which contain crystalline silica, did not participate in an exposure assessment to determine exposure to hazardous substances. The employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazards to determine employee exposure to air contaminants, thus exposing employees to chemical hazards, on or about, 10/12/16. b) Exterior Front of Building: An employee engaged in tuckpointing of mortar material did not participate in a exposure assessment to determine exposure to hazardous substances. The employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazards to determine employee exposure to air contaminants, thus exposing employees to chemical hazards, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a) a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees use hazardous chemicals and substances, including but not limited to, gasoline, Poly-Bond, Weatherseal spray & roll on, and StoPowerwall Stucco. The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program, thus exposing employees to chemical hazards, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees use hazardous chemicals and substances, including but not limited to, gasoline, Poly-Bond, Weatherseal spray & roll on, and StoPowerwall Stucco. The employer did not provide employees with safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals and substances, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) a) Stucco Mixing Area: Employees use hazardous chemicals and substances, including but not limited to, gasoline, Poly-Bond, Weatherseal spray & roll on, and StoPowerwall Stucco. The employer did not provide employees with information and training on hazardous chemicals and substances, thus exposing employees to chemical hazards, on or about, 10/12/16.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341830495.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.