Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DELAVAL DAIRY SERVICE

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DELAVAL DAIRY SERVICE in WIESE BROTHERS FARMS 7043 BUNKER HILL RD., GREENLEAF, WI 54126 (NAICS 423820). OSHA activity number 341838175.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Delaval Dairy Service — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Delaval Dairy Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
WIESE BROTHERS FARMS 7043 BUNKER HILL RD.
City
GREENLEAF
State
WI
ZIP
54126
Mailing
360 FARMLAND DR., KAUKAUNA, WI 54130
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423820
Employees
37
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $12,471
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  The employer did not establish an energy control program at their Northeast Wisconsin-Kaukauna location consisting of adequate energy control procedures, employee training, and periodic training when employees were performing service and maintenance work on farmstead machines and equipment on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12471
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):  The employer's developed energy control procedure at their Northeast Wisconsin-Kaukauna location did not have a specific statement of the procedure's intended use, procedural steps for controlling the hazardous energy, procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout or tagout devices, and specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to verify the effectiveness of the energy control measures.  Energy control procedures need to be specific for the equipment, or equipment type, being serviced or maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): A procedure was not utilized to afford the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device when servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, department or other group:  The employer did not develop and implement written energy control procedures at their Northeast Wisconsin-Kaukauna location for employees participating in group lockout tagout when servicing and/or maintaining farmstead machinery and equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  On or about October 10, 2016, employees were exposed to the ingoing nip points from a chain and sprocket while servicing a pneumatic powered crowd gate located at 7043 Bunker Hill Rd. Greenleaf, WI 54126.  The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to them standing on the crowd gate to install an oil fill plug.  The crowd gate moved forward unexpectedly causing an employee to reach into the rotating chain and sprocket.  The machine was not deenergized prior to the employees engaging in the servicing/maintenance activity.    As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lockout/tagout device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910.147(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)] were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12471

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341838175.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.