JACKSONVILLE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: VALADEZ CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VALADEZ CORP in 1515 PRUDENTIAL DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341843217.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VALADEZ CORP
- Site address
- 1515 PRUDENTIAL DRIVE
- City
- JACKSONVILLE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32207
- Mailing
- 628 NW 13TH ST #13, BOCA RATON, FL 33486
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On October 17, 2016, on the ground and lower roofs, employees handling plywood were not wearing a hard hat, exposing themselves to an overhead hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1090
- — Z (S) $1817
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On October 17, 2016, on the roof, employees using nail guns and a power saw to cut plywood were not wearing safety glasses, exposing themselves to an eye hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1090
- — Z (S) $1817
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: a. On October 17, 2016, on the top roof, employees nailing plywood sheathing were not protected from a 13 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. b. On October 17, 2016, on the middle roof, employees handling plywood were not protected from an 10 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. c. On October 17, 2016, on the lower roof, employees handling plywood were not protected from an 18 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2245
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On October 17, 2016, the ladder used to access the 3rd level did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to an 8 feet fall hazard. b. On October 17, 2016, the ladder used to access the 4th level did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to an 8 feet fall hazard. c. On October 17, 2016, the ladder used to access the top level roof did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to a 13 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1090
- — Z (S) $1817
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341843217.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.