Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VALADEZ CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VALADEZ CORP in 1515 PRUDENTIAL DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341843217.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Valadez Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valadez Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VALADEZ CORP
Site address
1515 PRUDENTIAL DRIVE
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32207
Mailing
628 NW 13TH ST #13, BOCA RATON, FL 33486
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Abate by
Nov 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a. On October 17, 2016, on the ground and lower roofs, employees handling plywood were not wearing a hard hat, exposing themselves to an overhead hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1090
  • — Z (S) $1817

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Abate by
Nov 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a. On October 17, 2016, on the roof, employees using nail guns and a power saw to cut plywood were not wearing safety glasses, exposing themselves to an eye hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1090
  • — Z (S) $1817

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Abate by
Nov 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system:    a. On October 17, 2016, on the top roof, employees nailing plywood sheathing were not protected from a 13 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.     b. On October 17, 2016, on the middle roof, employees handling plywood were not protected from an 10 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.     c. On October 17, 2016, on the lower roof, employees handling plywood were not protected from an 18 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2245
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Abate by
Nov 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,817 · Current $1,090 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a. On October 17, 2016, the ladder used to access the 3rd level did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to an 8 feet fall hazard.    b. On October 17, 2016, the ladder used to access the 4th level did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to an 8 feet fall hazard.    c. On October 17, 2016, the ladder used to access the top level roof did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to a 13 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1090
  • — Z (S) $1817

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341843217.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.