Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RODOLFO HERNANDEZ ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RODOLFO HERNANDEZ ROOFING in 5441 S. 88TH ST, LINCOLN, NE 68526 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341846624.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rodolfo Hernandez Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rodolfo Hernandez Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5441 S. 88TH ST
City
LINCOLN
State
NE
ZIP
68526
Mailing
807 S. BROAD ST. LOT # 33, FREMONT, NE 68025
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  The employer is failing to protect employee(s) from falls while working on a roof at 5441 S. 88th Street, Lincoln, NE.  The pitch of the roof is greater than 4:12 and the height to the eave was over 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  The employer is failing to protect employees from a fall hazard at 5441 S. 88th Street, Lincoln, NE, in that the ladder used to access the roof was not extended 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder with more than one support attachment were not placed with the two rails supported equally:  The employer is failing to protect employees from a fall hazard at 5441 S. 88th Street, Lincoln, NE, in that the ladders used to access the roof was set up along the rake side in lieu of the eaves.  Instances include but are not limited to:  i.  Employees using the ladder by the garage as means of access and egress from the roof is set up along the rake side thus the tops of the rungs do not make even contact so the ladder wiggles while employees climb it. .  ii.  Employees using the latter on the deck as means of access and egress from the back porch roof is set up along the rake side thus the tops of the rungs do not make even contact so the ladder wiggles while employees climb it.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341846624.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.