FARMINGDALE, ME —
OSHA Inspection: MAILLET, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MAILLET, INC. in 509 MAINE AVE, FARMINGDALE, ME 04344 (NAICS 423120). OSHA activity number 341846848.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAILLET, INC.
- Site address
- 509 MAINE AVE
- City
- FARMINGDALE
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04344
- Mailing
- 509 MAINE AVE, FARMINGDALE, ME 04344
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423120
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Facility - A written respiratory protection program, to protect the health of employees sanding paint, degreasing truck beds, and spray applying methylene bisphenyl isocyanate containing bed liner, was not established or implemented for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Facility - Employees using a tight fitting full face supplied air respirator, while spraying truck bed liners, were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I B
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(B): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees with a condition that interfered with the face-to-facepiece seal or valve function: Facility - Employees wearing respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were not consistently using the bottom strap to assure a proper face to facepiece seal.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2672
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $0 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: Facility - The supplied air respirator was not stored in a manner that protected it from dust and contamination.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2672
1910.134 I05 I
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $0 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(i): Compressors used to supply breathing air to respirators were not so constructed and situated so as to prevent entry of contaminated air into the air-supply system: Facility - The inlet for the air to the supplied air respirator was located in the garage where it could become contaminated with exhaust emissions from vehicles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2672
1910.1000 A01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the ceiling concentration of 0.200 milligrams per cubic meter: The employee spraying bedliners was exposed to MDI above the ceiling concentration of 0.200 milligrams per cubic meter, in the following instances: a) Facility - On October 20, 2016, the morning concentration was 120% (0.240) of the ceiling concentration. b) Facility - On October 20, 2016, the afternoon concentration was 115% (0.231) of the ceiling concentration.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): Facility - Administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented for employees exposed to methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423120)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341846848.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.