Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BECK OIL COMPANY OF ILLINOIS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BECK OIL COMPANY OF ILLINOIS in 1010 HEITMANN DRIVE, LINCOLN, IL 62656 (NAICS 447110). OSHA activity number 341847788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Beck OIL Company of Illinois — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Beck OIL Company of Illinois is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1010 HEITMANN DRIVE
City
LINCOLN
State
IL
ZIP
62656
Mailing
850 E THOMPSON, PRINCETON, IL 61356
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
447110
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.67 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,413 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:    On or about October 11, 2016, an employee was exposed to fall hazards when working out of Biljax lift and the employee did not use a suitable harness and lanyard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6413

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,811 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about October 11, 2016, employees were exposed to inhalation and contact with Sherwin Williams paint and other hazardous chemicals and the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4811

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:    On or about October 11, 2016, employees were exposed to inhalation and contact with Sherwin Williams paint and other hazardous chemicals and the employer did not maintain a copy of the safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about October 11, 2016, employees were exposed to inhalation and contact with Sherwin Williams paint and other hazardous chemicals and the employer did not ensure each employee was trained on the following:    1. The requirements of the standard;  2. Any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present;   3. The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets required by this section;  4. The methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.)  5. The physical, health, simple asphyxiation, combustible dust, and pyrophoric gas hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified, of the chemicals in the work area;   6. The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used; and,  7. The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341847788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.