Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ELIAS CASILLAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELIAS CASILLAS in 3612 133RD ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79423 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341847986.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elias Casillas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elias Casillas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ELIAS CASILLAS
Site address
3612 133RD ST.
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79423
Mailing
2702 DARTMOUTH ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79415
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).  The employer did not ensure employees engaged in roofing activities were provided a program with frequent and regular inspections and made by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):   The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  The employer did not ensure employees performing roofing activities were trained to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions associated with roofing work and exposed them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.  The employer did not require employees performing roofing work to don personal protective equipment while working and exposed them to struck-by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  Employees engaged in roofing work without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Employees performing roofing work without fall protection were not provided a program to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to follow in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Employees performing roofing work had not trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to follow that would minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341847986.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.