LUBBOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ELIAS CASILLAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELIAS CASILLAS in 3612 133RD ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79423 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341847986.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELIAS CASILLAS
- Site address
- 3612 133RD ST.
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79423
- Mailing
- 2702 DARTMOUTH ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79415
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). The employer did not ensure employees engaged in roofing activities were provided a program with frequent and regular inspections and made by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: The employer did not ensure employees performing roofing activities were trained to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions associated with roofing work and exposed them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2672
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions. The employer did not require employees performing roofing work to don personal protective equipment while working and exposed them to struck-by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Employees engaged in roofing work without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees performing roofing work without fall protection were not provided a program to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to follow in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3207
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3207
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Employees performing roofing work had not trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to follow that would minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341847986.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.