Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FINISHLINE AUTOS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FINISHLINE AUTOS, LLC in 1250 ROUTE 5, CHITTENANGO, NY 13037 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 341848463.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Finishline Autos, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Finishline Autos, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1250 ROUTE 5
City
CHITTENANGO
State
NY
ZIP
13037
Mailing
1250 ROUTE 5, CHITTENANGO, NY 13037
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811198
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)  Employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:   a) Body Shop, on or about 10/13/16: Employer had not established a written respirator protection program when employee was required to wear a half face air purifying respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   Note:  The employer may discontinue an employees medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.     a) Body Shop, on or about 10/13/16: Employee required to wear half face air purifying respirator had not been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight fitting face piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:    a) Body Shop, on or about 10/13/16: Employee required to wear half face air purifying respirator had not been fit tested.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)  The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, and annual (or more often if necessary) training to employees who are required to use respirators:     a) Body Shop, on or about 10/13/16: Employee required to wear half face air purifying respirator and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: 1) Labeling and other forms of warning;   2) MSDS requirements for the hazardous materials known to be present at the jobsite;   3) Employee training and information. The written program must also include: (a) A list of all the chemicals used at the jobsite.   (b) Methods to inform employees of hazards associated with non-routine tasks.   (c) Methods the employer will use to inform any contractors employees of workplace hazards.    a) Throughout the facility, on our about 10/13/16: A written hazard communication program was not developed for the employees who work with hazardous materials including but not limited to: PPG Paints0; Fiberglass Filled Filler; Rust-Mort and General Purpose Solvent.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:    a) Throughout the facility, on or about 10/13/16: Employee exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to:  PPG Paints; Fiberglass Filled Filler; Rust-Mort and General Purpose Solvent and were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Finishline Autos, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341848463.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.