Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WILLBROS CONSTRUCTION (U.S.), LLC-DELAWARE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WILLBROS CONSTRUCTION (U.S.), LLC-DELAWARE in 5501 COUNTY ROAD 18, DAMON, TX 77430 (NAICS 237120). OSHA activity number 341848547.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Willbros Construction (U.S.), Llc-Delaware — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Willbros Construction (U.S.), Llc-Delaware is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5501 COUNTY ROAD 18
City
DAMON
State
TX
ZIP
77430
Mailing
4400 POST OAK PARKWAY SUITE 1000, HOUSTON, TX 77027
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237120
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    a) At the site, where the employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program.  Employees were performing abrasive blasting activities on a natural gas pipeline that contained a 10% Chrysotile coating.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $5000
  • — C (S) $8149
  • — Z (S) $8149

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    a) At the site, where the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for the Harsco Black Beauty blasting media.  Employees were performing abrasive blasting activities on a natural gas pipeline.   The Black Beauty blasting media contains Silica.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $11,408 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems:  a) At the site, where the designated competent person was not competent in that he was not able to correctly calculate the slope of the excavation and he was not familiar with the requirements contained in Subpart X for the construction of stairways, exposing employees to caught-in and fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $11408
  • — Z (S) $11408

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,408 · Current $7,985 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section:    a) At the site, where employees performed abrasive blasting activities on a natural gas pipeline inside an excavation that was not protected from cave-ins hazards exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $7985
  • — C (S) $11408
  • — Z (S) $11408

1926.1052 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,408 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:    a) At the site, where employees used stairways to access and egress from an excavation that were not equipped with stair rails.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $5000
  • — C (S) $11408
  • — Z (S) $11408

1926.1052 C12

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926:    a) At the site, where stairway landings used to access and egress from an excavation were not provided with a guardrail system.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas:    a) At the site on or about October 7, 2016 and at times thereafter, where employees were not in a regulated area while removing asbestos containing material (ACM) with a hammer from a natural gas pipeline inside an excavation.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $8000
  • — C (S) $8149
  • — Z (S) $8149

1926.1101 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(2): Signs were not provided and displayed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7) :    a) At the site on or about October 7, 2016 and at times thereafter, where there were no warning signs that demarcated the regulated area where employees removed asbestos containing material from a natural gas pipeline that was 10% Chrysotile.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed:    a) At the site, on or about October 7, 2016 and at times thereafter, where the employer did not conduct exposure monitoring to determine the employees' exposure to asbestos.  Employees removed asbestos containing material from a natural gas pipeline that was 10% Chrysotile.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (S) $8149
  • — Z (S) $8149

1926.1101 J02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(2)(i): The employer did not establish a decontamination room or area for employees and equipment, adjacent to the regulated area, consisting of an impermeable drop cloth on the floor or horizontal working surface, for employees engaged in Class I work involving less than 25 linear or 10 square feet of thermal system insulation or surfacing asbestos containing material and for Class II and Class III asbestos work operations where exposures exceed a permissible exposure limit or where there was not negative exposure assessment produced before the operation:    a) At the site on or about October 7, 2016 and at times thereafter, where there was no decontamination area adjacent to the regulated area where employees removed asbestos containing material from a natural gas pipeline.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (S) $8149
  • — Z (S) $8149

1926.1101 K09 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not ensure participation in the asbestos training program by each employee who was likely to be exposed to asbestos in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), or for each employee engaged in Class I through Class IV asbestos operations:    a) At the site on or about October 8, 2016 and at times thereafter, where employees removing asbestos containing material from a natural gas pipeline were not trained in the hazards of asbestos.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (S) $8149
  • — Z (S) $8149

1926.1101 K08 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(i): Labels were not affixed to all products containing asbestos and to all containers containing such products, including waste containers:    a) At the site, where there were no asbestos labels affixed to the waste containers where asbestos containing material was disposed.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $2000
  • — C (S) $8149
  • — Z (S) $8149

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341848547.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.