Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS ROSALES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS ROSALES in 7402 MOSLEY, AMARILLO, TX 79104 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341854206.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Rosales — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Rosales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS ROSALES
Site address
7402 MOSLEY
City
AMARILLO
State
TX
ZIP
79104
Mailing
2214 RULE ST, AMARILLO, TX 79107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,363 · Current $682 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:      Employees without protective head gear were exposed to struck by hazards while working on the ground, as other employees performed framing work above them at a height of approximately 9 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $681.5
  • — Z (S) $1363

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.  Employees engaged in framing work were operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection were exposed to struck-by injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,363 · Current $682 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.      Employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to electrical shock hazards from pulled strain relief on electrical cords attached to saws.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $681.5
  • — Z (S) $1363

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,363 · Current $682 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used.      Employees engaged in framing work were exposed to electrical shock hazards while using worn and frayed electrical extension cords attached to power equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $681.5
  • — Z (S) $1363

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $1,604 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).     Employees  engaged in framing activities on the east side of the roof were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.5
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,817 · Current $909 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step.        Employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet while using the cap step on an "A" ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $908.5
  • — Z (S) $1817

View Luis Rosales's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341854206.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.