Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: DANIELS FRAMING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIELS FRAMING in 7900 KINGSGATE, AMARILLO, TX 79119 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341857100.

Watch Daniels Framing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniels Framing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DANIELS FRAMING
Site address
7900 KINGSGATE
City
AMARILLO
State
TX
ZIP
79119
Mailing
310 S. FLORIDA, AMARILLO, TX 79106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $978.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    Employees working without hard hats were exposed to struck-by hazards while working on the ground level as other employees performed decking work above.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $978
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.   Employees engaged in framing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i):  Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters or an assured equipment grounding conductor to protect employees on construction sites:    Employees were operating electrical powered equipment connected to flexible cord that was missing the ground pin, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.404 B01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(iii):  Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:   The employer did not ensure employees performing framing work were trained to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions associated with missing ground pins and no strain relief on electrical power equipment, exposing them to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  The employer did not ensure power tools were equipped with strain relief on all electrical equipment employees operated onsite, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards. a.  Flexible cord; b.  Power station.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2282.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).    Employees engaged in framing work without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Employees performing framing work without fall protection were not provided a program to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to follow in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341857100.