Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RHYNEHART ROOFING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RHYNEHART ROOFING INC. in 7912 ZOE, AMARILLO, TX 79118 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341857134.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rhynehart Roofing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rhynehart Roofing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7912 ZOE
City
AMARILLO
State
TX
ZIP
79118
Mailing
6900 W. MCCORMICK RD., AMARILLO, TX 79118
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.   Employees engaged in framing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.404 B01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i):  Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters or an assured equipment grounding conductor to protect employees on construction sites:  Employees were operating electrical powered equipment connected to flexible cord that was missing the ground pin, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.404 B01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(iii):  Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:   The employer did not ensure employees performing roofing work were trained to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions associated with missing ground pins and no strain relief on electrical power equipment, exposing them to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,183 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was six (6) feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Employees engaging in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six (6) feet without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.503 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Employer did not train employees to recognize hazards related to falls and the procedures to follow that would minimize those hazards while performing roofing activities at a height over 6 feet without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Employer did not ensure that  portable ladders used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least three (3) feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Employee engaged in roofing work was exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that was not secured on an stable surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.1053 B08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8):   The employer did not ensure ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic was not secured to prevent accidental displacement, or barricaded to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder:  Employer did not ensure that the employee secured ladder in place so as to prevent accidental displacement, exposing employee to a fall from six (6) feet to lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  An employee performing roofing work used a ladder had not been trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to follow that would minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341857134.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.