Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: KENTLAND ELEVATOR AND SUPPLY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KENTLAND ELEVATOR AND SUPPLY, INC. in 300 S. 4TH ST., SHELDON, IL 60966 (NAICS 424510). OSHA activity number 341857639.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kentland Elevator and Supply, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kentland Elevator and Supply, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
300 S. 4TH ST.
City
SHELDON
State
IL
ZIP
60966
Mailing
300 S. 4TH ST., SHELDON, IL 60966
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424510
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,549 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15ft, while opening and closing lids on the tops of rail cars, because the employer did not ensure the work area was guarded by a standard railing or ensure that employees wore fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3549
  • · Z (S) $5070

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $2,028 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Employees were exposed amputation hazards because the take up pulleys on the transfer belts were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2028
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $2,028 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i):     Projecting shaft ends shall present a smooth edge and end and shall not project more than one-half the diameter of the shaft unless guarded by nonrotating caps or safety sleeves.    Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards because the shafting on the distribution end of the transfer belts projected more than half of the shaft diameter.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2028
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.219 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(ii): The unused keyway(s) of projecting shaft end(s) were not filled up or covered:    Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards because the shafting on the distribution end of the transfer belts had exposed keyways.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):     Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    Employees were exposed to contact with the unguarded portion of the pulleys on the distribution end of the transfer belts because pulley nip points were not suitably enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i):     Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1010.219(m) and (o):    Employees were exposed to contact with belts on the distribution end of the transfer belts because the drive belts were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):     Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    Employees were exposed to nip and sheer points when working near the distribution end of the transfer belts because the sprockets and chains were not enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341857639.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.