KENOSHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ADM CONTRACTORS, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADM CONTRACTORS, LLC in 3905 52ND ST. UNIT 458, KENOSHA, WI 53144 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341857647.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADM CONTRACTORS, LLC
- Site address
- 3905 52ND ST. UNIT 458
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53144
- Mailing
- 6134 S. HOWELL AVE., MILWAUKEE, WI 53207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,710 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) The employer did not ensure that all employees who were exposed to struck-by hazards from either personnel, material or equipment were protected by head protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1710.4
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $2,566 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falling to the lower level by using a fall protection system when conducting roofing work on a commercial building.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2565.6
- — C (S) $3207
- — Z (S) $3207
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a commercial building.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3207
- — Z (S) $3207
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341857647.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.