WASHINGTON, DC —
OSHA Inspection: GOEL SERVICES INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GOEL SERVICES INC. in 2006 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVENUE, SE, WASHINGTON, DC 20020 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 341862373.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GOEL SERVICES INC.
- Site address
- 2006 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVENUE, SE
- City
- WASHINGTON
- State
- DC
- ZIP
- 20020
- Mailing
- 6201 DIX STREET, NE, WASHINGTON, DC 20019
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.62 D01 III
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,334 · Current $0 Reduced
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level: (a) Throughout Building - On or about October 19, 2016, employees were performing manual demolition work to include but not limited to cutting out pipes, mechanical components from an elevator shaft, knocking down walls containing flaking paint, cleaning up flaking paint from the floor and window sill surfaces, knocking down chimney, removing stairwell walls and shoveling debris into a wheelbarrow for removal. They were exposed to flaking paint containing 0.5098 to 4.0427 percent inorganic lead. The employer did not collect full shift samples that represented each job classification in each work area or shift with the highest exposure level. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7334
- — Z (S) $7334
1926.51 F01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,334 · Current $7,500
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): Adequate washing facilities were not provided for employees engaged in the application of paints, coating, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants might have been harmful to the employees: (a) Throughout Building - On or about October 19, 2016, potable water and towels were not available for employee use while performing manual demolition on building which contained flaking paint with 0.5098 to 4.0427 percent inorganic lead. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $7500
- — C (S) $7334
- — Z (S) $7334
1926.62 I05 I
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i): The employer did not provide adequate hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.51(f), for use by employees exposed to lead: (a) Throughout Building -On or about October 19, 2016, where employees doing manual demolition and lead was present, the employer provided a bucket with water for employees to rinse their hands. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.52 D01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $102,667 · Current $12,000 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.52(d)(1): In all cases where the sound levels exceeded the values shown in Table D-2 of 29 CFR 1926.52, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program was not administered: (a) 2nd Floor NE Stairwell Area - On or about November 4, 2016, a Laborer, who was engaged in demolition activities, was exposed to continuous noise at 331.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 98.6 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 347 minute sampling period. A zero exposure was assumed for the 133 minutes not sampled. The employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program. (b) 2nd Floor SE Stairwell Area - On or about November 4, 2016, a Laborer, who was engaged in demolition activities, was exposed to continuous noise at 447.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 100.8 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 343 minute sampling period. A zero exposure was assumed for the 137 minutes not sampled. The employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program. (c) 2nd Floor NE/SE Stairwell Area - On or about November 4, 2016, a Laborer, who was wetting down the demolition areas and removing material from the demolition areas, was exposed to continuous noise at 115.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 91.0 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 326 minute sampling period. A zero exposure was assumed for the 154 minutes not sampled. The employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $12000
- — C (W) $102667
- — Z (W) $102667
1926.101 B
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.101(b): Ear protective devices inserted in the ear were not fitted or determined individually by competent persons: (a) 2nd Floor NE Stairwell Area - On or about November 4, 2016, Laborer, who was engaged in demolition activities, was exposed to continuous noise at 331.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 98.6 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 347 minute sampling period. A zero exposure was assumed for the 133 minutes not sampled. The employee wore ear plugs that were not fitted by a competent person. (b) 2nd Floor SE Stairwell Area - On or about November 4, 2016, Laborer, who was engaged in demolition activities, was exposed to continuous noise at 447.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 100.8 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 343 minute sampling period. A zero exposure was assumed for the 137 minutes not sampled. The employee wore ear plugs that were not fitted by a competent person. (c) 2nd Floor NE/SE Stairwell Area - On or about November 4, 2016, Laborer, who was wetting down the demolition areas and removing material from the demolition areas, was exposed to continuous noise at 115.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 91.0 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 326 minute sampling period. A zero exposure was assumed for the 154 minutes not sampled. The employee wore ear plugs that were not fitted by a competent person. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (W) $0
- — Z (W) $0
More inspections at Goel Services INC.
View Goel Services INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in DC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341862373.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.