ORLANDO, FL —
OSHA Inspection: JON RICHARDS COMPANY FL, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JON RICHARDS COMPANY FL, INC. in 10890 GENERAL DR., ORLANDO, FL 32824 (NAICS 339999). OSHA activity number 341869584.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JON RICHARDS COMPANY FL, INC.
- Site address
- 10890 GENERAL DR.
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32824
- Mailing
- 10890 GENERAL DR., ORLANDO, FL 32824
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339999
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) Paint Area - No respirator program was developed and respirator usage was required by the employer, on or about November 22, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Paint Area - No medical evaluations were conducted and respirator usage was required by the employer, on or about November 22, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Paint Area - No fit tests were conducted and respirator usage was required by the employer, on or about November 22, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a) Paint Area - No training was provided on the use of respirators, on or about November 22, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $1,738 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): a) Paint Area - No initial determination was conducted and measureable levels of hexavalent chromium were detected during monitoring of the painter, on or about November 22, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1738.2
- — Z (S) $2897
1910.1026 H01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(h)(1): A hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI); however, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and/or did not ensure that employees used such clothing and equipment: a) Paint Area - The painter had measureable levels of hexavalent chromium and was not required to wear appropriate clothing to protect his exposed skin during spraying operations, on or about November 22, 2016. His exposed areas included hands, arms, neck and face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 L02 I A
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI), in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026: a) Paint Area - The painter had measureable levels of hexavalent chromium and was not provided with any information on the hazards of hexavalent chromium or the contents of the standard, on or about November 22, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at JON Richards Company FL, INC.
View JON Richards Company FL, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339999)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341869584.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.