TULSA, OK —
OSHA Inspection: BRADEN SHIELDING SYSTEMS, L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRADEN SHIELDING SYSTEMS, L.L.C. in 9260 BROKEN ARROW EXPRESSWAY, TULSA, OK 74145 (NAICS 337127). OSHA activity number 341869691.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRADEN SHIELDING SYSTEMS, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 9260 BROKEN ARROW EXPRESSWAY
- City
- TULSA
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74145
- Mailing
- 9260 BROKEN ARROW EXPRESSWAY, TULSA, OK 74145
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337127
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,463 · Current $1,478 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained. On or about October 26, 2016, there were no operable gauges or alarms in the paint spray booth to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and/or hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1477.8
- — Z (S) $2463
1910.107 C02
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Open flame or spark producing equipment was located in the spraying area or within 20 feet thereof, and was not separated by a partition. On or about October 26, 2016, an electrical outlet was located within 20 feet of the paint spray booth and was not separated by a partition. Employees were exposed to the hazard of fire and/or explosion.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary: On or about October 26,2016, paint spray booth was not kept free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues. Employees were exposed to the hazard of fire.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,463 · Current $1,478 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about October 26, 2016, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine employee's ability to use a respirator before requiring employee to use a tight-fitting half facepiece respirator. Employee was exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1477.8
- — Z (S) $2463
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about October 26, 2016, the employer did not provide fit testing for employees using tight-fitting half facepiece respirators prior to use. Employees were exposed respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,463 · Current $1,478 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about October 26, 2016, the employer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program that described how the criteria for labeling, safety data sheets, and training would be met. Employees were using products that contained chemicals such as, but not limited to; Toluene at 30-50%, n-Butyl alcohol at 10-30%, and Acetone at 20-30%. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and/or hazards associated with fire/explosion.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1477.8
- — Z (S) $2463
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337127)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341869691.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.