Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: APPROVED ROOFING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of APPROVED ROOFING, LLC in 209 82ND STREET, ANNA MARIA, FL 34216 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341877389.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Approved Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Approved Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
209 82ND STREET
City
ANNA MARIA
State
FL
ZIP
34216
Mailing
1111 26TH AVE E, BRADENTON, FL 34208
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $3,563
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection.   a) For employees working at 209 82nd Street in Holmes Beach, as observed on or about October 27, 2016. Employees were using power tools with extension cords that did not have ground fault circuit interrupter protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:  a) For employees working at 209 82nd Street in Holmes Beach, as observed on or about October 27, 2016. Employees were using power tools connected to an outlet that was not grounded.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $3,563
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a) For employees working at 209 82nd Street in Holmes Beach, as observed on or about October 27, 2016. Employees were installing roofing material on a residential roof without the use of fall protection system in place. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.51 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1926.51(a)(4): The common drinking cup was not prohibited:  a) For employees working at 209 82nd Street in Holmes Beach, as observed on or about October 27, 2016. Employees were drinking out of a water container without the use of individual cups. The employees were holding the container up and drinking right out of the common tap.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a) For employees working at 209 82nd Street in Holmes Beach, as observed on or about October 27, 2016. Employees were working on a residential roof and the employer did not have a training certification record to verify compliance of training received.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341877389.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.