Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WOODSMAN KITCHENS & FLOORS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WOODSMAN KITCHENS & FLOORS, INC. in 11732 BEACH BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32246 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 341881027.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Woodsman Kitchens & Floors, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Woodsman Kitchens & Floors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11732 BEACH BLVD
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32246
Mailing
11732 BEACH BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32246
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
149
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $2,933 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a.  On or about November 1, 2016, fabricators were required to wear NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators while dry cutting granite and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluations, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2933.4
  • — Z (S) $4889

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  a.  On or about November 1, 2016, a fabricator used a 3M elastomeric half-face negative pressure respirator voluntarily when cutting and sanding material in the Corian Department and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluations, and training on the maintenance and care of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about November 1, 2016, fabricators who were required to wear NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators while dry cutting granite had not been provided with medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.  b.  On or about November 1, 2016, a fabricator who used a 3M elastomeric half-face negative pressure respirator voluntarily when cutting and sanding material in the Corian Department had not been provided with a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a.  On or about November 1, 2016, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about November 1, 2016, fabricators were required to wear NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators while dry cutting granite had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  a. On or about November 1, 2016, a fabricator used a 3M elastomeric half-face negative pressure respirator voluntarily when cutting and sanding material in the Corian Department and had not received respirator training prior to initial use of the respirator.    b. On or about November 1, 2016, fabricators and machine operators used NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators voluntarily throughout the Granite and Corian Departments when performing routine operations and had not received respirator training prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $2,933 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a.  On or about November 1, 2016, the employer did not include in the hazard communication program an explanation of the labeling system, safety data sheet, and training to employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to acetone and silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2933.4
  • — Z (S) $4889

View Woodsman Kitchens & Floors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341881027.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.