Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IMAGINE RUG COMPANY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of IMAGINE RUG COMPANY, LLC in 639 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, CHATSWORTH, GA 30705 (NAICS 314110). OSHA activity number 341886869.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Imagine RUG Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Imagine RUG Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
639 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
City
CHATSWORTH
State
GA
ZIP
30705
Mailing
639 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, CHATSWORTH, GA 30705
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
314110
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not ensure the Mitsubishi 25 Pole Hyster model number FGC25 and serial number AF828-50621 was equipped with proper personal protective equipment such as a seat belt (operating restraint system). Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.    2) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not ensure the Mitsubishi forklift truck model number FGC25B and serial number AF82B05303 was equipped with proper personal protective equipment such as a seat belt (operating restraint system). Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1069
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $1,425 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)    1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employees were operating a Mitsubsihi 25 Pole Hyster (model number FGC25 and serial number AF828-50621) with defective and worn tires.  Employees were exposed to a tip-over hazard from operating it.    2) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employees were operating a Mitsubsihi Hyster (model number FGC25B and serial number AF82B05303) with defective and worn tires.  Employees were exposed to a tip-over hazard from operating it.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1425
  • — Z (S) $2850

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, equipment such as boxes, paint bucket and other materials were stored in front of the 480 volts electrical panel box, creating insufficient working space for authorized personnel who were required to perform service or maintenance on the equipment.  The employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $1,425 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:     Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the electrical outlet box was not completely enclosed with covers designed by the manufacturer, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards of 110 volts.  The electrical outlet was missing a faceplate and supplying power to the lights in the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1425
  • — Z (S) $2850

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program that included a listing of all chemicals employees were required to use on a daily basis such as, but not limited to, Propane and glue.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1069
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each shift for chemicals used:  1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not provide or make available safety data sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals employees were using at the site, including but not limited to Propane and Glue.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): 29 CFR 1919.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:  1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to all employees that may be exposed to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to propane and glue, location of safety data sheets and Global Harmonization System.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  1) Production Area: On or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not train or certify the employees operating the Mitsubsihi 25 Pole Hyster (model number FGC25 and serial number AF828-50621) before allowing them to operate the equipment.  Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.  2) Production Area: Or or about November 2, 2016, the employer did not train or certify all employees operating the Mitsubsihi forklift truck (model number FGC25B and serial number AF82B05303) before allowing them to operate the equipment.  Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341886869.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.