Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JM BEST CONNECTICUT ROOFING LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of JM BEST CONNECTICUT ROOFING LLC in 22 BUTTON STREET, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341887586.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JM Best Connecticut Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JM Best Connecticut Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
22 BUTTON STREET
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06450
Mailing
385 COOKE STREET, WATERBURY, CT 06710
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2017
Abate by
Mar 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 22 Button Street, Meriden, CT 06450  a) Abatement certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001, Citation 01, Item 002a, Citation 02, Item 001 was not received within 10 calendar days (by January 29, 2017) following the abatement due dates (January 19, 2017).   b) Abatement certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 002b and Citation 02, Item 002 was not received within 10 calendar days (by February 12, 2017) following the abatement due dates (February 2, 2017).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2017
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  JOBSITE:  The side rails of the Little Giant Ladder used by employees to access the roof of a house did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2017
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder with more than one support attachment were not placed with the two rails supported equally:  JOBSITE:  The tops of the side rails of the Little Giant Ladder used by employees to access the roof were not supported equally on the surface of the roof where the ladder was leaning.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2017
Abate by
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards.  JOBSITE:  The employees, using a Little Giant Ladder to access the roof of a house to perform residential roofing work were not trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2017
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,231 · Current $8,231
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   JOBSITE:  The employees, performing residential roofing work on a 4 in 12 pitched roof were not protected from falling between 9 feet 2 inches to 16 feet 3 inches to the ground by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest system, or other equivalent means.  JM Best Connecticut Roofing LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard {29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)}, which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1012123, Citation Number 01, Item Number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on 04/06/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 243 Bartholomew Road, Middletown, CT 06457.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8231

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2017
Abate by
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,879 · Current $5,879
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  JOBSITE:  The employees exposed to fall hazards while performing residential roofing work on a house were not provided with information and training to recognize fall hazards and the means to minimize and/or eliminate these hazards.  JM Best Connecticut Roofing LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard {29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)}, which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1012123, Citation number 01, Item number 001b and was affirmed as a final order on 04/06/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 243 Bartholomew Road, Middletown, CT 06457.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $5879

View JM Best Connecticut Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341887586.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.