Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STEVE BAKER

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STEVE BAKER in 97 WAUSSAU STREET, MILLINOCKET, ME 04462 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 341888501.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Steve Baker — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Steve Baker is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STEVE BAKER
Site address
97 WAUSSAU STREET
City
MILLINOCKET
State
ME
ZIP
04462
Mailing
4 GRANITE STREET, MILLINOCKET, ME 04462
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,870 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used to access the platform.:    Front of Residence - A ladder jack scaffold being used to access the roof was not provided with another ladder or acceptable means to access the platform exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870.4
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,870 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    Roof - Employees were replacing the roofing on a building approximately 13 feet above the ground without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870.4
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Roof - Employees were removing and replacing a roof 13 feet above the ground without being provided with hazard recognition training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2672

View Steve Baker's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341888501.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.