HAYWARD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: HINTON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HINTON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC. in 15909 DYNO DRIVE P.O. BOX 472, HAYWARD, WI 54843 (NAICS 315280). OSHA activity number 341893014.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HINTON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- 15909 DYNO DRIVE P.O. BOX 472
- City
- HAYWARD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54843
- Mailing
- 15909 DYNO DRIVE P.O. BOX 472, HAYWARD, WI 54843
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 315280
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E09 III
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- May 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $1,810 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area were not kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily: (a) Screen printing area; Press wash (flammable liquid) saturated rags (combustible material) were not disposed of in covered metal receptacles and the containers were not emptied daily.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1810
- — Z (S) $3622
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,085 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. (a) Screen printing area; The employer did not perform an assessment to determine if additional personal protective equipment needed to be worn during screen printing, preparation, and cleaning operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1085
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Screen printing area; A written respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented before employees were required to wear half mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Screen printing area; Medical evaluations were not performed before employees were required to wear half-mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) Screen printing area; Fit testing was not performed before employees were required to wear half-mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i): The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or interfered with valve function: (a) Screen printing area; Employees required to wear half-mask respirators had full beards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: (a) Screen printing area; Respirator training was not provided before employees were required to wear half-mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $1,455 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) Screen printing area; A quick drench shower or eye flushing station was not provided near the parts washer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1455
- — Z (S) $2897
1910.212 A03
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- May 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3): Point of operation guards were not provided: (a) Production area; Point of operation guarding was not provided for the lower blade exposure on a miter saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Throughout the facility; A written hazard communication program was not developed and maintained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section: (a) Screen printing and cleaning/reclaiming areas; Each chemical container was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): (a) Throughout the facility; Safety Data Sheets were not maintained and/or available for chemicals used in the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work areas at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Throughout the facility; On and before November 4, 2016, initial hazard communication training was not provided to inform employees of the hazards associated with the chemicals being used in the workplace. (b) Throughout the facility; On and before November 4, 2016, training was not provided to inform employees of the new container label elements and safety data sheet format.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2017
- Abate by
- May 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: (a) Embroidery department; A flexible extension cord was used in place of permanent wiring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 315280)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341893014.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.