Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRIEST AG GROUP, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TRIEST AG GROUP, INC. in 900 WEST GOLDEN ROAD, TIFTON, GA 31793 (NAICS 325320). OSHA activity number 341896793.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Triest AG Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Triest AG Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
900 WEST GOLDEN ROAD
City
TIFTON
State
GA
ZIP
31793
Mailing
P.O. BOX 965, TIFTON, GA 31793
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325320
Employees
56
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $8,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1680

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    (a) In the facility yard, on or about October 19, 2016, the employer exposed two employees to methyl bromide, a highly toxic pesticide, while processing returned product cylinders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8500
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.110 D10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(d)(10): Precautions were not taken to prevent damage to LP gas system(s) from vehicular traffic:    (a) Outside of the Refurbishing Building at the east end, on or about November 2, 2016 and at times prior to, an LP gas system was not protected from industrial truck traffic traveling around the structure, resulting in an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.119 D02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i): Process safety information pertaining to the technology of the process did not include the elements specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(A) through (E):  (a) Throughout the process area, on or about October 31, 2016 and at times prior to, the block flow diagram for the overall process (Figure 2:  Tifton Block Flow Diagram dated July 14, 2011) was inaccurate in that it did not include the presence of the liquid nitrogen system and instead referred to the presence of four (4) separate bottled nitrogen locations, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.119 D03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the elements specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(A) through (H):    (a)  In the nitrogen storage area, on or about October 31, 2016 and at times prior to, the P&IDs for the liquid nitrogen system (undated hand drawn Figures 1 & 2) were inaccurate in that they did not indicate the location or presence of any valves and/or gauges associated with the system, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 I01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1): The employer did not perform a pre-startup safety review for new facilities and for modified facilities when the modification was significant enough to require a change in the process safety information.  (a)  In the canning building, on or about February 8, 2017, and at times prior to, the employer did not perform and document a pre-start safety review with regards to the addition of a "small canning" line that was added to the covered process in 2015 exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.119 L04

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(4): Process safety information required by paragraph (d) of this section was not updated when a change covered by this paragraph resulted in a change in the process safety information.  (a) In the canning building, on or about February 8, 2017 and at times prior to, the employer did not update process safety information regarding the addition of a "small canning" line that was added to the covered process in 2015 exposing employees to a chemical hazard.  The employer failed to document information such as, but not limited to:  materials of construction, piping and instrumentation diagrams, electrical classification, relief system design and design basis, design codes and standards employed, material and energy balances, safety systems, and compliance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.119 L05

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(5): A change covered by this paragraph resulted in a change in the operating procedures or practices required by paragraph (f) of this section, and such procedures or practices were not updated accordingly:  (a)  In the canning building, on or about February 8, 2017 and at times prior to, the employer did not update operating procedures regarding the addition of a "small canning" line that was added to the covered process in 2015 exposing employees to a chemical hazard.  The employer failed to document information such as, but not limited to:  initial startup, normal operations, temporary operations, emergency shutdown, normal shutdown, operating limits, consequences of deviation, safety and health considerations, unique hazards, and safety systems and their functions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not complete actions to resolve PHA recommendations as soon as possible:  (a)  In the tank car area, on or about March 17, 2017 and at times prior to, the employer failed to promptly address the recommendations made by the PHA team.  Recommendations made during the September 21, 2015 PHA included installing pneumatic actuators at each rail station that had not been implemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.119 G03

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2017
Abate by
May 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(3): The employer did not prepare a record which contained the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training.  (a) In the canning building, on or about February 8, 2017 and at times prior to, the employer did not prepare a record which contained the identity of the employees, the dates of training, and the means used to verify that the employees understood the training with regards to the addition of the canning equipment to the overall covered process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341896793.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.