Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: METRO EAST INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METRO EAST INDUSTRIES, INC. in 3800 MISSOURI AVE, ALORTON, IL 62207 (NAICS 488210). OSHA activity number 341898658.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Metro East Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Metro East Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3800 MISSOURI AVE
City
ALORTON
State
IL
ZIP
62207
Mailing
3800 MISSOURI AVE, ALORTON, IL 62207
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488210
Employees
450
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,243 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:      Employer failed to ensure the exit route from hopper rail cars were kept unobstructed during blasting activities.  Employees were exposed to entrapment hazards when the blast media was allowed to pile up at the bottom gates blocking the egress path.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.146 C07 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(iii): The employer did not document the basis for determining that all hazards in a permit space had been eliminated, through a written certification that contained the date, the location of the space, and the signature of the person making the determination. The certification was not made available to each employee entering the space or to that employee's authorized representative:    Employer failed to document the basis for determining that all hazards in each permit space of hopper rail cars had been eliminated, through a written certification that contained the date, the location of the space, and the signature of the person making the determination. 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not reevaluate the non-permit space and determine whether it must be reclassified as a permit space in accordance with other applicable provisions of 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7):     Employer failed to reevaluate the non-permit spaces of the hopper rail cars and determine them to be permit-required confined spaces when spaces contained potentially hazardous atmospheres generated by sandblasting, grinding, welding, and other operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.146 D13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(13):  Entry operations were not reviewed when the employer had reason to believe that the measures taken under the permit space program would not protect employees and revise the program to correct deficiencies found to exist before subsequent entries were authorized:  The employer failed to review entry operations to correct deficiencies after receiving complaints from employees about the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 D03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,243 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations:    Employer failed to develop and implement the means, procedures and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations of hopper rail cars and the blast media recovery pit.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,243 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:      Employer did not assure each employee that was required to enter permit required confined spaces was trained with the knowledge and skills necessary to safely perform assigned duties.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $8,691
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    Employer did not develop, document and use procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy when performing maintenance on the blast media recovery auger.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $8691
  • — C (S) $7243
  • — Z (S) $7243

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):    On or about November 12, 2016, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts and in-going nip point hazards during servicing and maintenance of auger in the blast media recovery pit.  The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements].  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $10864
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.176 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,243 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(f): Derail and/or bumper blocks were not provided on spur railroad tracks where a rolling car could contact other cars being worked or enter a building, work or traffic area:      On or about November 1, 2016 and at times prior, the employer failed to provide a derailing device on the spur railroad track leading into the Paint Shop Light Blast area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.252 B04 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,243 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(4)(iv): An attendant with a preplanned rescue procedure was not stationed outside a confined space opening to observe the welder at all times in case of emergency and was not capable of putting rescue operations into effect:         The employer failed to ensure that an attendant with a preplanned rescue procedure was stationed outside the confined space opening of the hopper rail cars during welding activities in case of an emergency.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.252 C02 I C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,243 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(2)(i)(C): Mechanical ventilation was not provided in confined spaces or where the welding space contained partitions, balconies, or other structural barriers to the extent that they significantly obstructed cross ventilation:         The employer failed to provide mechanical ventilation in the confined spaces of the hopper rail cars during welding activities when cross ventilation was obstructed by structural barriers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7243
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.252 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(4)(i): All welding and cutting operations carried on in confined spaces were not adequately ventilated to prevent the accumulation of toxic materials or possible oxygen deficiency:     The employer failed to ensure that the confined spaces of hopper rail cars were adequately ventilated during welding activities.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Metro East Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341898658.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.