Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HAVIER RODRIGUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HAVIER RODRIGUEZ in 2013 SONGBIRD DRIVE, FORNEY, TX 75126 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341900272.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Havier Rodriguez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Havier Rodriguez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HAVIER RODRIGUEZ
Site address
2013 SONGBIRD DRIVE
City
FORNEY
State
TX
ZIP
75126
Mailing
1011 CAMERON, DALLAS, TX 75223
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Abate by
Mar 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $3,259
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) Employees using Hitachi pneumatic nail guns with no eye protection were exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Abate by
Mar 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) Employees installing roofing tiles on a residential home were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately nine feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341900272.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.