COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: ROGELIO RAMOS-CHAVEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROGELIO RAMOS-CHAVEZ in 895 HUBBELL DR, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80911 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341900389.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROGELIO RAMOS-CHAVEZ
- Site address
- 895 HUBBELL DR
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80911
- Mailing
- 16415 EAST 14TH PL, AURORA, CO 80011
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about November 8, 2016, Rogelio Ramos-Chavez, did not ensure that its employees were protected from falls while working at heights greater than 6 feet. Employees of Rogelio Ramos-Chavez were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 13.5 feet while engaged in roofing activities on the roof of a residential building with no fall protection in place. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2672
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access: (a) On or about November 8, 2016, Rogelio Ramos-Chavez did not ensure that portable ladders, used to access upper landing surfaces, extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access. Workers were observed using a ladder to access the roof of a residential building. Ladder extended 1.5 ft above the landing platform and was not tied to the roof edge. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341900389.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.