JOHNSTON CITY, IL —
OSHA Inspection: CROWN BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. DBA REACO BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CROWN BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. DBA REACO BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION in 17217 RT. 37, JOHNSTON CITY, IL 62951 (NAICS 335912). OSHA activity number 341911915.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 17217 RT. 37
- City
- JOHNSTON CITY
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62951
- Mailing
- SERVICE CENTER ONE, 17217 HIGHWAY 37, JOHNSTON CITY, IL 62951
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335912
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- May 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,605 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: In Building 3, the employer did not evaluate each powered industrial truck operator's performance at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $7605
1910.1018 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $5,767 Reduced
0260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(e)(1)(i): Determinations of airborne exposure levels were not made from air samples that were representative of each employee's exposure to inorganic arsenic over an eight -8 hour period: In Building 3, the employer did not perform initial monitoring for each workplace or work operation to accurately determine the airborne concentrations of inorganic arsenic.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5767.3
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.1018 G01 I
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $5,767 Reduced
0260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(g)(1)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not instituted to reduce inorganic arsenic exposure to or below permissible exposure limit: In Building 3, the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls to reduce inorganic arsenic exposures to employee's performing lead burning activities to or below the permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5767.3
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.1018 G02 I
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(g)(2)(i): A written program was not established, or implemented to reduce exposures to inorganic arsenic to or below the permissible exposure limit by means of engineering and work practice controls: In Building 3, the employer did not establish a written program to reduce inorganic arsenic exposures to employee's performing lead burning activities to or below the permissible exposure limit by means of engineering or work practice controls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $4,120 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: In Building 3, the racking system used to hold equipment and supplies was not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4119.7
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.1025 H02 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $4,120 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(2)(ii): Shoveling, sweeping or brushing methods were used to remove lead accumulations where vacuuming or other equally effective methods were available and feasible: In the Building 3 casting area, sweeping methods were used to remove lead accumulations where vacuuming or other equally effective methods were available and feasible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4119.7
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.1025 E03 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(ii): Written compliance programs for lead did not include the required sections: The written compliance program for lead activities did not include the following information as required: A.) A description of each operation in which lead was emitted; B.) A work practice program which includes the items required under (g), (h) and (i) of this regulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1025 E03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(iv): Written compliance programs for lead were not revised and updated annually to reflect the current status of the program: The written compliance program for lead was not revised and updated annually as required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Crown Battery Manufacturing Company, INC. DBA Reaco Battery Service Corporation
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335912)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341911915.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.