Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: D'ARRIGO CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D'ARRIGO CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. in 940 OHIO RIVER BOULEVARD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15202 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341912467.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D'Arrigo Construction Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D'Arrigo Construction Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
940 OHIO RIVER BOULEVARD
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15202
Mailing
21 BOCK LANE, PA
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,280 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met:       a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was in place at the job site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1280
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees had not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area:      a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees received appropriate chemical safety training prior to working with materials that contained chemicals like silica and items such as Portland Cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $1,710 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms:      Instances including, but not limited to the following:    a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that guardrail systems were installed along all open sides and ends of platforms in that guardrail systems were not in use along the east end of the scaffold, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 11 feet.     b) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that guardrail systems were installed along all open sides of platforms in that midrails for the guardrail systems were removed near the ladder entry area and by at least one mortar tub area, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 11 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1710
  • — Z (S) $2850

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): Where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures:      a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program was in use where employees were required to wear them during jobs such as mixing materials or cutting block.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select a NIOSH-certified respirator:      a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that respirators used at the job site were NIOSH-certified.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that medical evaluations were provided prior to wearing respirators during jobs such as mixing materials or cutting block.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):      a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee who wore a tight fitting respirator was given a fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer did not provide training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace:      a) Job site, 940 Ohio River Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 16, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that respiratory protection training was provided for employees who were required to wear respirators during jobs such as mixing materials or cutting block.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341912467.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.