Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QUAD CITIES CONCRETE PRODUCTS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of QUAD CITIES CONCRETE PRODUCTS, LLC in 636 10TH AVE. WEST, MILAN, IL 61264 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 341913457.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quad Cities Concrete Products, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quad Cities Concrete Products, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
636 10TH AVE. WEST
City
MILAN
State
IL
ZIP
61264
Mailing
636 10TH AVE. WEST, MILAN, IL 61264
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327390
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:    On or about November 16, 2016, the employer had not performed an evaluation to determine if any spaces were permit required confined spaces prior to allowing employees to enter the sand pit to perform cleaning operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2672

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:   On or about November 16, 2016, the employer had not informed employees by posting signs of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:  On or about November 16, 2016, employees entered confined spaces and the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C05 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(C): Before an employee entered a space, the internal atmosphere was not tested with a calibrated direct-reading instrument for oxygen, flammable gases and vapors and potential toxic air contaminants:  On or about November 16, 2016, employees entered confined spaces and the employer had not tested the atmosphere of the space prior to allowing the employees to enter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:  On or about November 16, 2016, employees were required to enter permit required confined spaces and the employer had not conducted training to ensure employees obtained an understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:    On or about November 16, 2016, employees were required to operate powered industrial trucks and the employer had not ensured that each operator had the required training such as, but not limited to: formal instruction and practical training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):      On or about November 16, 2016, employees were required to operate powered industrial trucks and the employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,272 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about November 16, 2016, employees in the sand pit were exposed to getting caught in the ingoing nip points of the tail pulley on the moving conveyor when dumping sand onto the conveyor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $2272

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2017
Abate by
Feb 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met  On or about November, 16th, 2016, employees work with adhesives and the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341913457.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.