Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COAST2COAST

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COAST2COAST in 56 MCDONOUGH STREET, HAMPTON, GA 30228 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341915833.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coast2coast — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coast2coast is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
COAST2COAST
Site address
56 MCDONOUGH STREET
City
HAMPTON
State
GA
ZIP
30228
Mailing
3752 GUTHRIE CIRCLE, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30044
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Abate by
Aug 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated.  On or about December 29, 2016 citations with penalties were issued to Coast2Coast for a violation of 29CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v), proof of abatement was not provided by January 26, 2017, the date the violation was to be abated.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $1000

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2016
Abate by
Jan 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated.   On or about November 16, 2016 at 56 McDonough Street, Hampton, GA:  An employee doing stucco while working in an aerial lift was exposed to a fall hazard when not wearing a body belt and lanyard attached to the boom or basket.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341915833.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.