BRIDGEPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: SCINTO TREE CARE LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCINTO TREE CARE LLC in 142 MADISON TERRACE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 341923217.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCINTO TREE CARE LLC
- Site address
- 142 MADISON TERRACE
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06606
- Mailing
- 357 COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 320096, FAIRFIELD, CT 06825
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 142 Madison Terrace, Bridgeport, CT 06606 Abatement certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001 was not received within 10 calendar days (by February 6, 2017) following the abatement due date (January 26, 2017).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1910.132 B
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(b): Where employees provide their own protective equipment, the employer did not assure its adequacy, including proper maintenance, and sanitation of such equipment: WORKSITE: The employer did not ensure that the employee owned personal protective equipment, such as (but not limited to) the 3-foot positioning lanyard was properly maintained and in good working condition.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341923217.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.