MARTINSBURG, WV —
OSHA Inspection: QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC. in 855 CAPERTON BLVD., MARTINSBURG, WV 25403 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 341926939.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC.
- Site address
- 855 CAPERTON BLVD.
- City
- MARTINSBURG
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 25403
- Mailing
- 855 CAPERTON BLVD., MARTINSBURG, WV 25403
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 1100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment: (a) Ink Manufacturing: On November 29, 2016 and times prior, a written mechanical integrity procedure was not developed for the temperature probe and sensor for the blue letdown tank (LTB-1). (b) Ink Blending: On November 29, 2016 and times prior, a written mechanical integrity procedure was not developed for the tank level probe and sensor for the red mix tank (WV-4010).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $9054
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.119 J04 IV
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The employer did not document each inspection and test that had been performed on process equipment: (a) Ink Manufacturing: On November 29, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not document the mechanical integrity inspection for the temperature probe and sensor for the blue letdown tank (LTB-1). (b) Ink Blending: On November 29, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not document the mechanical integrity inspection for the tank level probe and sensor for the red mix tank (WV-4010).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $10,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Press Room, G-14: On October 25, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on folder nip rolls on the G-14 press to protect employees from the ingoing nip point. (b) Finishing Maintenance: On November 10, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on a Clausing drill press (model #1671, serial #15536942) to protect employees from the rotating chuck and the unused portion of the bit. (c) Finishing Maintenance: On October 17, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on a Manhattan drill press (model #951210, serial #220659) to protect employees from the rotating chuck and the unused portion of the bit. (d) Finishing Department, HT63: On November 16, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the Saddle Stitcher SP1000 Delivery to protect employees from rotating parts and ingoing nip point. (e) Finishing Department, HT142: On November 16, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the Saddle Stitcher SP1000 Delivery to protect employees from rotating parts and ingoing nip point. (f) Finishing Department, HT111: On November 16, 2016 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the Saddle Stitcher SP1000 Delivery to protect employees from rotating parts and ingoing nip point.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $10000
- — C (S) $9054
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,432 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end, and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: (a) Machine Shop: On November 17, 2016 and times prior, employees were exposed to a grooved horizontal rotating shaft end that was 3/4 inch in diameter and projected 1 and 1/4 inches from the Baldor Buffer (model #333B, serial #P999).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5432
- — Z (S) $5432
More inspections at Quad/Graphics, INC.
View Quad/Graphics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in WV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341926939.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.