Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MID STATE CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MID STATE CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 44 HORATIO ST., NEW YORK, NY 10014 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341933232.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MID State Construction Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MID State Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
44 HORATIO ST.
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10014
Mailing
74 PORETE AVENUE, NORTH ARLINGTON, NJ 07031
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,939 · Current $2,204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:     a) Interior of Building - Basement: Employee without any head protection was engaged in demolition work and exposed to a head injury as he worked below lifting operation of 5 gal buckets filled of debris, on or about 10/26/16
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2204.25
  • — Z (S) $2939

1926.251 B03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,765 · Current $1,324 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(b)(3): Job or shop hooks and links, or makeshift fasteners, formed from bolts, rods, etc. or other such attachments were used:    a) Interior of Building : Employees engaged in demolition work were hoisting 5Gl buckets filed with pieces of concrete with a hook made of bended reinforcement rebar, on or about 10/26/16
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1323.75
  • — Z (S) $1765

1926.403 I02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,205 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures:    a) Interior of Building - Frist Floor - Main Hallway: Employees were exposed to electric shock as the energized temporary  light fixture  did not have a bulb and was open, on or about 10/26/16   b) Interior of Building - Basement: Employees were exposed to electric shock as the energized main panel had no cover, on or about 10/26/16
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2205
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.405 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:    a) Interior Main Entrance - First Floor: Employees were exposed to electric shock while working in the vicinity of energized electric boxes that did not have faceplates, on or about 10/26/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,939 · Current $2,204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    a) Interior of Building - First Floor: Employees engaged in demolition work were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet, on or about 10/26/16
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2204.25
  • — Z (S) $2939

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,939 · Current $2,204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:   a) Interior of Building - Basement: Employees engaged in demolition work were exposed to impalement hazards as they worked over uncapped reinforcement rebar, on or about 10/26/16
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2204.25
  • — Z (S) $2939

View MID State Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341933232.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.