Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AVIAGEN NORTH AMERICA INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AVIAGEN NORTH AMERICA INC. in 20768 CR 200, WATERTOWN, NY 13601 (NAICS 112340). OSHA activity number 341937795.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aviagen North America INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aviagen North America INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20768 CR 200
City
WATERTOWN
State
NY
ZIP
13601
Mailing
20768 CR 200, WATERTOWN, NY 13601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
112340
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $6,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):      a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/2016: The employer did not assess the workplace for the personal protective equipment needed to protect employees against hazards including, but not limited to, chemicals such as glutaraldehyde.    Certification of abatement must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6600
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/18/2016: Employees were not provided with training on the personal protective equipment needed such as gauntlet type gloves, to work with dangerous contact chemicals including, but not limited to, Synergize containing glutaraldehyde.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/18/2016: The employer did not provide suitable personal protective equipment such as gauntlet type gloves to protect employees against contact hazards including, but not limited to, glutaraldehyde.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $7,950 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1361

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:      a) Hatch room, on or about 12/13/16: Respiratory hazards were not identified nor levels estimated for employees sanitizing hatch room  while spraying with Synergize, a disinfectant containing  7 % glutaraldehyde.     Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7950
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:.  a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: Medical evaluations for respirator use was not provided for employees wearing full face air purifying respirators such as maintenance employees when working with formaldehyde.  Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1048 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.1048(g)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(iii)(B)(1), and (d)(2)) and (f) through (m), which covers each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1048 to use a respirator:   a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: A respiratory protection program was neither written nor implemented for employee wearing full face air purifying respirators such as maintenance employees when working around formaldehyde.  Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1048 N03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3)(iv): The training program on formaldehyde did not include the purpose for, proper use of, and limitations of personal protective clothing and equipment:   a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: Training on respirators was not provided for employees wearing full face air purifying respirators such as maintenance employees when working with formaldehyde.   Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $6,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:      a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: A Lockout/Tagout program was not developed for employees working and maintaining on equipment with multiple energy sources including, but not limited to, The Accucount 340 Chick Counter Boxer System that runs on 480 volts of electricity and 40 psi of pneumatic energy.    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6600
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.1020 E02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $7,950 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1020(e)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not, upon request, ensure each employee and designated representative access to employee exposure records, defined in 29 CFR 1910.1020(e)(2)(i)(A)(1)-(3) as relevant to employee exposure:      a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/21/16: Following an incident involving Synergize, a disinfectant containing 7 % glutaraldehyde,  the safety data sheet was neither provided to the injured employee as an exposure record for her physician nor to the employee representative at Cortech.    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7950
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.1048 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $7,950 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1048(i)(3): When there was a possibility that an employee's eyes could be splashed with solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater formaldehyde, the employer did not provide acceptable eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use:    Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: An eyewash was not provided for employees working with 37%  formaldehyde liquid.      Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7950
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.1048 M01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,864 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(1)(iii): The employers did not include formaldehyde in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200). Employers did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of formaldehyde and to safety data sheets, and was trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (n) of this section.   a) Chick room, on or about 12/13/16: A written hazard communication program for formaldehyde exposures was not developed and implemented for the workplace. Sampling on 12/13/16 showed that a maintenance employees was exposed to a short tem exposure limit of 1.1 parts per million.   Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10864

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,950

Hazardous substances 1361

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: A hazard communication program was not developed nor implemented for employees that work chemicals including, but not limited to, Synergize containing glutaraldehye.       Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7950
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1361

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a) Throughout the facility, on or about 11/29/16: Information and training was not provided for employees that use hazardous chemicals in the work place including, but not limited to, Synergize containing glutaraldehye.    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1048 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde:    a) Chick room, on or about 12/13/16: Formaldehyde monitoring was not done for employees removing wicks containing formaldehyde from Chick room.   Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Aviagen North America INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341937795.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.